![]() Can you check that? I don't know if I am safe with XL for a Tokina 11-16 (not the widest 11 mm). Did you test with the GH5 but anamorphic? Isn't it full sensor area when it is anamorphic? I wonder if happens the same results. If I was in the market again I'd go with whatever one had the best price.I use the Speedbooster XL on the Tokina 11-16 APS-C.hand held with IBIS on, I get zero Vignetting and it gets me down to 7.4mm at f1.8, so very fast and very wide!.I did consider the PL 8-18 for a bit, but I find 12 mm already wide on the GH5 (I own the PL 12-60), so for the rare occasion I need wider, I already owned the Tokina and it's 1 1/3 stops faster.I remember previous discussions, re the XL or Ultra SB, on APS-C lenses, though at the time, I felt it was easy enough to do a small crop in post and the wider FOV and extra 1/3 stop was significant with the XL.also no issues with the Sigma 18-35.these lenses are Nikon mount and on a tripod the results are the same.I had initially thought it might be an issue with handheld, but there's none. 64x did vignette a bit with ultra wide lenses like the 11-16 Tokina, so if you're doing a lot of ultra wide stuff you might get annoyed with it. 8 - Pocket 4K Camera DCI 4K Sigma Art 18-3535mm f1. 71x was better if you wanted more reach out of your lenses. 'IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST' is a short film about paranoia, survival and the consequences of ones actions.COLOR GRADING BREAKDOWN. 95 Wide Cine Lens MFT M43 Panasonic GH5/S Blackmagic BMPCC 4K Olympus Very Fast f/0. 64x was nice if you wanted to shoot wider stuff or were dying for that extra touch of low light, the. Ive checked our forums and also on youtube, but cannot find any post-version 3.0 AF tests for C-AF in video as well as. ![]() I wouldn't trust auto focus on either setup really, and don't expect any adapter to work flawlessly 100% of the time, but in my experience with them you do get more consistent performance when you pay for a Metabones.Ä«etween the. I know ever since the Em1ii got firmware 3.0 that the video AF is drastically improved, but I havent seen any tests with it on the new firmware with the sigma 18-35 adapted, which I already own along with a viltrox efm2. BUT they are near impossible to get working on other MFT cams like the BMPCC4K and Z Cam E2, which sucks if you ever switch systems or find yourself using one of those for a bit. 18, 2021 Panasonic GH6 will be priced around ,500 After the GH6 pre. so I am thinking to sell my 16-35 EF lens and get the speedbooster EF to M4/3 with Sigma 18-35 F1.8 ART. GH5 Mark II which was launched in a double announcement with the GH6 there were. I have a problem with my micro 4/3 lens in low-light since its maximum aperture is 4. The thing that makes me lean towards the Sigma 18-35 is of course the extra range but also that I have seen beautiful results together with a GH5, I dont find the same sharp and filmic look on the videos I found on the Voigt w/ a GH5. And I already have Canon 5D mark iii with 24-105mm (4) and 16-35 (2.8) EF Lenses. ![]() That being said the Viltrox work, and they work very well for the money on a Panasonic. So Im thinking of eather getting the Sigma 18-35 or the Voigt 25 0.95. Metabones don't fringe and glow wide open like Viltrox do, they adapt to BMPCCs, Z Cams, and Panasonics properly, they don't have to be adjusted to properly find infinity focus, have somewhat usable continuous auto focus, and they're built way better (no wiggle in lens and camera connection). I had 2 Viltrox for about a year before getting one Metabones, and then a 2nd, owned all 4 adapters together for about 2 years and you can tell the difference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |